Democrat Policy Concentrates Wealth and Bias

Democrats today value race over economics. John F. Kennedy said that when the economic tide comes in all of the ships in the harbor rise Democrats of the Clinton-Obama era seek just the betterment of their own party constituency if that. President Obama has sought just to enrich the most rich.

The party of Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy is long dead. The Bush-Clinton-Obama line advanced Wall Street and corporate interests. For some investors if terrorism happens in a nation the significant concern is how it effects the profit and loss statement of the fortune 500.

The democrat party constituency in a way still believes in the party of Kennedy and Robert Hubert H. Humphrey when the interests of the common working class and middle class men and women together with the poor were the primary concern. The party was more realistic in those days than today where the party leadership consistently says one thing and does another. Lawyers are purveyors of words with guile rather than business men and women of action. They may say anything to get elected then simply work for the interests of globals and the most rich.

Democrat party leaders say words that bring votes and actions that concentrate wealth while stagnating wages for the middle class and poor. Good jobs are sent abroad to China and with fewer employed in the United States at any time in the past 40 years reports about the economy are shrunken such that it seems as if the economy is healthy.

American blacks are the worst off in the Bush-Clinton-Obama line of economic shrinking. Students must pay off huge college loans while career jobs are moving targets and flee abroad. The great tax cuts of Barrack Obama were acts of economic racism against black economic developments that a white male president could not have got away with, yet blacks just want more and voted for a second term for Barrack Hussein Obama.

Formerly it was the responsibility of the democratic Party to run candidates that better the situation for American workers rather than drive them out of the work force, send good jobs overseas, sustain 50 million on food stamps and entitlement programs to half of the people of the United States.

News media owned by Wall Street as well as the Soviet era Pravda like national Public Radio back up the shrinking economic picture reports readily-they are in the half of the country with good income after all and relegate the losers to the new normal they have accepted as the way things are. The way things are though is evolving away from real democracy with lesser disparity between rich and poor and toward a global plutonomy with nations fading away to business districts controlled by corporate-government elites-where real candidates and concepts for issues that might trouble the ruling class simply won’t exist. Dope and large screen t.v.s and more can pacify the masses.

Or can it? If the entire world is brought to an American standard of living it would quickly consume planetary resources with the environment brought to conclusive ruin. Even if American voters are reduced to spineless followers with complaints and protests about white males such as they were in the 1950s economically in comparison to everyone else, that world will still be long expired and the wages of American blacks and white women will fall into decline to as they are controlled and set aside with development going elsewhere in the world.

It is an irony that the first black President got away with committing the most racist economic tax cut against black Americans in modern times to the society and nation. All the President needed to do was just not sign the bill into law-a single veto, and he could have negotiated for tax cuts with republicans from the bottom up starting with complete exemption for the poor. Instead the Harvard lawyer dumped everything he could to the rich and left nothing at all for democrats to negotiate with. Lost was funding for students, new alternative infrastructure development, paying off the national debt, space colonization and development of electro-magnetic accelerators in the moon and Mars, environmental recovery, free college education, increased scientific research funding and a guaranteed minimum income of one-quarter the average working wage. With a fairly progressive tax on wealth those doing business in the U.S.A. would be those willing to invest here and contribute to the U.S.A. as if it mattered. If Hillary Clinton were to be elected, the first women President may bring about a substantive decline in the average wage of white women since their modern rise though brought them to within a fraction of the average of working men.

A Sixty-Four Billion Year Question

Space membranes may have irregular shapes that when intersecting provide irregular rates of apparent time passage. They may alternatively have regular shapes that when intersecting or passing through other membranes provide an apparent smooth rate of expansion of space-time resembling that of dark energy. Dark energy is regarded preponderantly as responsible for the increasing rate of expansion of the space of the observable Universe. Cosmologists think the rate of expansion of space and time will continue until a big rip occurs when the Universe is 64 billion years old whereat it will cease to exist, failing to draw social  security benefits itself from an economics expanded with federal reserve zero interest loans.

Membranes capable of being an entire Universe when intersecting at various angles or portions contacting must be of very large size one might think. Size is relative though, in a completely empty void a one inch membrane might as well be a mile. Only in relation to other membranes or things could comparative quantification occur.

If a membrane is not of zero dimensions simultaneously existing yet not existing-logically somewhat absurd except perhaps for quanta in some form of super-position even with a timeless, eternal form, then it must be made of something. In a field particles arise of various sizes as energy wave packets. A membrane though is regarded as some kind of fundamental entity without parts. Irreducible membranes of one dimension even seem less probable than super-positioned zero-dimensional membranes that take one dimensions with interference, observation and waveform collapse or simply the word of God.

A membrane of n-dimensions may be a quantified field in the mind of God initially structured in a spiritual sense that with interference and intersections collapses from the superpositions of the mind of God into one-dimensional and concatenated dimensional forms. Recombinant dimensional membranes perhaps with an unknown forms of charge-perhaps multi-tensor charges could build up super-dimensions with greater magnitudes than other membranes.

The shape of the Universe spatially speaking was and probably is of interest to cosmologists. It could have been toroidal, spherical etc. Perhaps there is no clearly definable shape for a Universe at the leading, expanding edges whereat it fades off into a nothingness emptier than nothing itself. It may simply be an apparent Universe with apparent yet not real space that is instead a concatenated and apparent effect for observers from one-dimensional membranes moving through one another. When one membrane passes along the axis of another it may appear as an acceleration of spatial expansion to local observers.

Any sort of turn or deflection for a membrane’s shape would require some irregularity of force acting at that place. The presence or absence of planar deformation, or of spherical deformation if a singularity, indicates the presence of a heterodox field or membrane element. Maybe some theorists regard individuated endowments of force as fundamental brains with the optimal shape for a brane corresponding to the configuration of dimensions in which it coheres. Dimensional brains thus appear to be theoretically embedded within a Chinese puzzle box of additional dimensional branes.

In evolutionary biology there is an argument that mutation is the primary agent for change rather than natural selection. Mutation though is a way of saying change of an individual from an existing pattern. The capacity for mutability is an implicit aspect of being. God may be changeless and eternal, yet space-time beings change perpetually. Mutation however is regarded as occurring to living beings rather than to inanimate molecular forms. Complexity in biological forms allows for a suggestion of mutation from an existing pattern whereas for geological formations talus slopes for example are said to evolve under the influence of the second law of thermodynamics and entropy with the increase of disorder. Can dimensional membranes be thought of as mutable or are they just too simple even to be considered to evolve?

Relationships of membranes that change in a field of all possible membranes existing might be regarded as evolving. Evolution occurs in the space-time changes for observers living in a nexus of interacting membranes. For God hosting the membrane field, nothing changes in a sense. The membrane’s position and motion follow His will. Intellect of observers changes too, yet as in a level 4 Multiverse intellect is an apparent phenomena embedded in the interacting membrane fields. It is pre-determined though able apparently to modify energy-matter forms in a small way within a space-time manifold. God configured the complete field from eternity with space-time membranes comprising contingent ontology-for-others.

 

Hitler and Kaine as Moral Authorities

In a recent interview vice-presidential candidate Tim Kaine said that ‘people can make their own moral decisions-so did Adolph Hitler on his own moral authority. The idea that evil actions are moral decisions rather than immoral decisions require an oxymoronic regard negating the moral paradigm lest one assume that every decision is a moral one. Moral decisions are bracketed by universe of immoral decisions.

Morality is not set individually any more than language is created individually.It’s a social phenomena. Morality is a description of what people of a society actually do. If their ethics are fundamentally, preponderantly immoral then the society can be said to be an immoral one. People have the choice of obeying or not social morality and moral norms.

Marcus Tulius Cicero wrote a treatise on natural law. He believed that nature itself has an implicit morality to wherein moral people must cohere. Cicero provided an example of the unnatural death of youth being wrong. He might have cited child sacrifice to Moloch as naturally wrong, whereas to Tim Kaine and Adolph Hitler that would be a personal moral choice.

It might be argued that personal moral decisions that do not involve others are in a realm wherein an individual has absolute moral authority. However decisions that do not involve other people in society at all-and even suicide involves others-would not be moral questions.

The Ten Commandments are not set individually. One may choose to follow or break the ten commandments yet one cannot create or uncreate the moral authority that provided them. Christians and Jews believe God provided the ten moral commandments. Tim Kaine might think that the ten commandments have no more moral authority than his own and that he and each individual should write in effect, their own commandments, disregard those of God and decide if they will or will not break them. If Tim Kaine and society did follow the course of creating and structuring their own moral authority exclusively it might be said that society was in a state of moral anarchy. When the Bible says ‘thou shalt not kill’, one cannot make a moral judgment of the commandment with personal authority. It is only possible to make an ethical decision to obey or disregard the commandment.

Moral norms are empirical facts describing concatenated mass social behavior. Individuals may use their own ethics that are decisive in following or breaking moral norms for whatever reason, however the moral paradigm is socially constructed or evolved, provided by divine providence etc.

I believe that in this age of fracture the destruction of conventional moral norms by democrat and Corporate party leadership is basically motivated to provide no resistance to the accumulation of wealth and power by one percent of the populous globally. With a doped up and immoral social order corrupt leadership would be more at home. When the environment breaks down too far and overpopulation or rebellion challenges the elite’s position an immoral social order would provide less resistance to their mass destruction by elite that would a priori be a logical goal of a post-apocalyptic new world order.

Democrat’s Got a New World Order 2

It was something of an amazing transition when the Presbyterian Church U.S.A. accepted homosexual marriage transforming itself into Another Church of Abomination. For secularists churches are social conveniences more suitable to supporting political correctness than Godliness following the ways of God given in the Holy Bible. Wall Street and President Obama want homosexual hegemony. Cultural decadence isn’t new of course. That’s what this blog post is about.

Some elitist Democrat-supporting-economists suggest that though the median wage for men hasn’t improved in 40 years it doesn’t matter. They say that even though fewer people are employed in the U.S.A. now than in about 40 years, the economy is healthy.

National economic growth averaged about 1% the past year as economic growth for the rich increased more. It also increased for the top middle class skilled workers that support a corrupt economic infrastructure. In 2013 economic growth was actually higher in the U.S.A. at 1.6%. The broadcast media have circled their wagons in support of corrupt Democrat party economic policy spinning the economic narrative as if most of the public have amnesia. I wrote an article on the near recession economy in 2013 that I will reprint before continuing the present essay.

U.S. Economic Growth Just 1.6% in 2013
17 Dec. 2013
Enriching the Wall Street Banks with zero interest Fed loans has enabled in part global investments enriching Saudi Arabia, China, India, Argentina and other economies with hot economic expansion rates of G.D.P. On October 19 The Economist reported the U.S. G.D.P. rate at 1.6% for 2013, China’s at 7.5%, India’s at 4.4%,Argentina’s at 8.3% and Saudi Arabia’s at 5.1%. And the U.S. rate may be puffed up by the Wall Street bank and investor profits on investments in foreign economies.

Even a zero-quantitative rate of economic growth is o.k. if qualitative growth increases, public debt is reduced, the environment restored and the quality of living of the poor and middle class increases. Such right-thinking policy goals are perhaps considered in some collegiate ecological economic colloquia yet definitely not in the U.S. Government or on Wall Street.

Since the Obama administration generally followed Bush II economic policy with permanent Bush II tax cuts the economic interests of the poor and middle class have continued to be stagnant if not downward. Nothing in administration policy seems designed to counter that. The big question is; will the President get in his 200th round of golf before January 1st?

Money supply the past decade increased 400% while national public debt is nearing 20 trillion dollars. The Federal Reserve simply bought U.S. bonds with fiction money so the U.S. government could have trillions to pay out in part to support the vast number of people-almost 50% of Americans, receiving Federal payments of some kind. That all follows traditionally corrupt economic practices common even in late Republican Rome when bread and circuses were given to pacify masses of poor Roman plebeians.

The rich are concentrating wealth and franchising the world so far as possible. Every economic act trickles up a percent of profit to ultimate insiders of Wall Street that would rule the world given the chance. Zero and fractional interest loans from the Federal Reserve allowed big banks the power to leverage free Federal Reserve sourced money to loan out five times more to people that repay real money. In practical effect the Federal Reserve let the rich produce free money themselves -trillions…

Increasing inflated money supply to the richest who invest overseas while enriching skilled workers serving them and transforming more than a quarter of the economy into financial workers serving the money flow systems of a wealth concentration establishment-and the entire phenomena greased with free money, public debt and foreign investment-is a classic recipe for financial disaster. The convenience of a corrupt economic system of tremendous advantage to an establishment draws millions of mindless minions to the most common and onerous of classic large-scale economic corruptions.

Democrat party politics from the slave era to the present wasn’t not been reluctant to exploit non-party members (and even those too on occasion). The 20th century wars led by Democrat Presidents were advanced with death greasing party cadre skids. Did President Roosevelt-F.D.R.-really need to get America involved in the second world war? Might not a different President have found a way to stop the war from ever starting? Didn’t the U.S. Army Air Force have a few wings to station in England before the battle of Britain that a different President might have sent to stop that action before it started?

F.D.R. having traveled to Europe more than 20 times while a youth and must have had some inkling that a vast war was imminent and might have been nipped in the bud with a proactive policy.

W.W. I era French Prime Minister Clemenceau said that World War II was guaranteed when the U.S.A. signed a separate treaty with Germany wherein the U.S.A. wouldn’t  act as guarantor of the peace. Even in the late 1930s it is probable that F.D.R. could have guaranteed the peace with adequate force disposition to England and France if he had been interested in stopping the conflict from starting. Couldn’t Roosevelt have based a large naval force in Britain and the U.S. Army on the continent preventing Hitler from ever taking the French coast? Might not it have been possible for some other President to get on better with Soviet Russia at least so far as to prevent the Soviet-Nazi treaty that secured Hitler’s eastern frontier until he commenced operation Barbarossa? Why would FDR actual want to let the war start?

With the late entry in W.W. II Roosevelt could accomplish all of his U.S. Democrat party promotion agenda such as full employment, movement of Negroes into military service and social and education acceleration, women into industrial jobs and even military increases. FDR also go near dictatorial war powers (again like an ancient Roman dictator appointed during time of war).  Earlier he had tried to expand and pack the Supreme Court with sympathetic judges. Failing in that the war was a pragmatic opportunity for politics by his decree.

With the second world war F.D.R. was able to accomplish the great increase in Federal power that was the foundation of the modern Orwellian state seeking in a corporatist union to advance to a new world order.

Comparatively Harry S. Truman accomplished not so much consolidation of the Democrat Party power agenda. He did drop a pair of nuclear bombs in Japan-yet that only demonstrated nuclear power to the world as the first shock and awe episode (it was effective) bringing about the immediate end of the war with Japan. Though the well known stories of an immanent attack on Pearl Harbor and of disregard of the messages from the White House have been given a certain interpretation, from another one can surmise that if the Japanese naval forces had been intercepted and defeated in a timely way that might have foreshortened a war that F.D.R. was confident of winning after a few years of full industrial production and scientific development under his near dictatorial authority. Democrats regarded virtually F.D.R. as god-like.

J.F.K. brought Americans into Vietnam though it was his Vice President L.B.J. who turned it into a quagmire providing forerunners of Halliburton (via Kellogg, Brown and Root) with contracts to build most of the U.S. military bases in Vietnam. A new form and era of kickback to corporate establishment was founded continuing through the Iraqi and Afghan conflicts with no-bid Halliburton contracts. G.W. Bush was the first Democrat-like President of the modern era-minus the anti-Christian element though. Some believe that his father’s press Sect. Marlin Fitzwater was that administration’s Monica Lewinsky and that a both ways former C.I.A. chief. Vice-President and President ( G.H.W. Bush) was the point source of perversion for the deformation of post-Cold War U.S. political developments taken to extremes by following administrations. I don’t know if the G.H.W. Bush perversion story is true, nor if the Florida Marlins as an expansion team that won the World Series following the G.H.W. Bush administration was an honest fluke or one designed by insider martinets as a p.r. obfuscation device.

L.B.J was a great war expander throwing all branches of service and contractors into the conflict creating full employment. He was yet the inventor of the great society program to relieve poverty in the U.S.  bringing innumerable social changes. Barack Obama stimulated Muslim conflict in the Middle East and regime change in Libya, Syria and even Egypt cautiously. Growing up in a Sunni nation-Indonesia-the President seemed too willing to support Sunni rebels to overthrow a Christian-friendly Alawite (Shi’a derivative) government led by a British trained dentist Bashar Assad. Hundreds of thousands of refugees including Muslim fled to Europe and America enabling a new Muslim infrastructure for support of terror where none had existed before. The U.S.A. took in 10,000 Syrian refugees the last year alone. Though none or some may be terrorists today they comprise future contacts and possible support for emergent Muslim terrorists globally. Needless to say, the Obama approach to the Middle East and support for the Syrian war an accelerant on the deaths and wounding of more than a million souls though if his objective was to send Muslims to the Christian world-that was accomplished.

ences more suitable to supporting political correctness rather than Godliness following the ways of God given in the Holy Bible. Wall Street and President Obama want homosexual hegemony. Cultural decadence isn’t new of course. That’s what this blog post is about.

Some elitist Democrat supporting economists suggest that though the median wage for men hasn’t improved in 40 years that doesn’t matter. They say that even though fewer people are employed in the U.S.A. now then, again, in about 40 years, the economy is healthy.

National economic growth average about 1% the past year though the economic growth for the rich increases. It also increases for the top middle class skilled workers that support a corrupt economic infrastructure. In 2013 economic growth was actually higher in the U.S.A. at 1.6%. The broadcast media have circled their wagons in support of the corrupt Democrat party economic policy spinning the economic narrative as if most of the public have amnesia.I wrote an article on the near recession economy in 2013 I will reprint before continuing on with the present essay.

U.S. Economic Growth Just 1.6% in 2013
17 Dec. 2013
Enriching the Wall Street Banks with zero interest Fed loans has enabled in part global investments to enrich Saudi Arabia, China, India, Argentina and other economies with hot economic expansion rates of G.D.P. In October 19th The Economist reported the U.S. G.D.P. rate with a 1.6% rate for 2013, China’s at 7.5%, India’s at 4.4%,Argentina’s at 8.3% and Saudi Arabia’s at 5.1%. The U.S. rate is probably puffed up by the Wall Street bank and investor profits on investments in foreign economies.

Even a zero-quantitative rate of economic growth is o.k. if qualitative growth increases, public debt is reduced, the environment restored and the quality of living of the poor and middle class increasing. Such right-thinking policy are perhaps considered in some collegiate ecological economic colloquia yet definitely not in the U.S. Government or on Wall Street.

Since the Obama administration generally followed Bush II economic policy with permanent Bush II tax cuts the economic interests of the poor and middle class have continued to be stagnant if not downward. Nothing in the administration policy seems designed to counter that. The big question is; will the President get in his 200th round of golf before January 1st?

Money supply the past decade increased 400% while national public debt is nearing 20 trillion dollars. The Federal Reserve simply bought U.S. bonds with fiction money so the U.S. government could have trillions to pay out in part to support the vast number of people-almost 50% of Americans, receiving Federal payments of some kind. That all follows traditionally corrupt economic practices common even in late Republican Rome when bread and circuses were given to pacify the masses of poor Roman plebeians.

The rich are concentrating wealth and franchising the world so far as possible. Every economic act trickles up a percent of profit to the ultimate insiders of Wall Street that would rule the world given the chance. Zero and fractional interest loans from the Federal Reserve allowed big banks the power to leverage that free money to loan out five times more to people that must repay real money. In practical effect the Federal Reserve let the rich produce free money themselves -billions and billions…

Increasing inflated money supply the richest use to invest overseas while enriching skilled workers serving them and transforming more than a quarter of the economy into financial workers serving the money flow systems of a wealth concentration establishment-and the entire phenomena greased with free money, public debt and foreign investment-is a classic recipe for financial disaster. The convenience of a corrupt economic system of tremendous advantage to an establishment draws minions of mindless followers to the most common and onerous of classic large-scale economic corruptions.

Democrat party politics from the slave era where it led to the present has not been reluctant to exploit non-party members (and even those too on occasion) to the 20th century wars led by Democrat Presidents may be advanced with exploitation. Did President Roosevelt-F.D.R.-really need to get America involved in the second world war? Might not a different President have found a way to stop the war from ever starting? Didn’t the U.S. Army Air Force have a few wings to station in England before the battle of Britain that a different President might have sent to stop that action before it started? F.D.R. having traveled to Europe more than 20 times while a youth must have had some inkling that a vast war was imminent and might have been nipped in the bud with a proactive policy?

W.W. I era French Prime Minister Clemenceau said that World War Ii was guaranteed when the U.S.A. signed a separate treaty with Germany wherein the U.S.A> wouldn’t need to act as guarantor of the peace; even in the late 30s it is probable that F.D.R. could have guaranteed the peace with adequate force disposition to England and France if he had been interested in stopping the conflict. Couldn’t Roosevelt have based a large naval force in Britain and the U.S. Army on the continent preventing Hitler from ever taking the French coast? Might not it have been possible for some other President to get on better with Soviet Russia at least so far as to prevent the Soviet-Nazi treaty that secured Hitler’s eastern frontier until he commenced operation Barbarossa? Why would FDR actual want to let the war start?

With the late entry in W.W. II Roosevelt could accomplish all of his U.S. Democrat party promotion agenda such as full employment, movement of Negroes into military service and social and education acceleration, women into industrial jobs and even military increases. FDR also go near dictatorial war powers (again like an ancient Roman dictator appointed during time of war).  Earlier he had tried to expand and pack the Supreme Court with sympathetic judges. Failing in that the war was a pragmatic opportunity for politics by his decree.

With the second world war F.D.R. was able to accomplish the great increase in Federal power that was the foundation of the modern Orwellian state seeking in a corporatist union to advance to a new world order.

Comparatively Harry S. Truman accomplished not so much consolidation of the Democrat Party power agenda. He did drop a pair of nuclear bombs in Japan-yet that only demonstrated nuclear power to the world as the first shock and awe episode (it was effective) bringing about the immediate end of the war with Japan. Though the well known stories of an immanent attack on Pearl Harbor and of disregard of the messages from the White House have been given a certain interpretation, from another one can surmise that if the Japanese naval forces had been intercepted and defeated in a timely way that might have foreshortened a war that F.D.R. was confident of winning after a few years of full industrial production and scientific development under his near dictatorial authority. Democrats regarded virtually F.D.R. as god-like.

J.F.K. brought Americans into Vietnam though it was his Vice President L.B.J. who turned it into a quagmire providing forerunners of Halliburton with contracts to build all the U.S. military bases in Vietnam. A new form and era of kickback to corporate establishment was founded then continuing through the Iraqi and Afghan conflicts. G.W. Bush was the first Democrat-like President of the modern era-minus the anti-Christian element though. L.B.J was a great war expander throwing all branches of service and contractors into the conflict creating full employment. He was yet the inventor of the great society program to relieve poverty in the U.S.  bringing innumerable social changes. Barack Obama stimulated Muslim conflict in the Middle East and regime change in Libya, Syria and even Egypt cautiously. Growing up in a Sunni nation-Indonesia-the President seemed too willing to support Sunni rebels to overthrow a Christian-friendly Alawite (Shi’a derivative) government led by a British trained dentist Bashar Assad. Hundreds of thousands of refugees including Muslim fled to Europe and America enabling a new Muslim infrastructure for support of terror where none had existed before. The U.S.A. took in 10,000 Syrian refugees the last year alone. Though none or some may be terrorists today they comprise future contacts and possible support for emergent Muslim terrorists globally. Needless to say, the Obama approach to the Middle East and support for the Syrian war an accelerant on the deaths and wounding of more than a million souls though if his objective was to send Muslims to the Christian world-that was accomplished.


 

Modern Renormalization of Ontology

Some time around the middle of the 20th century the field of philosophy called ontology began to experience a change. Ontology is the study of being in the largest sense. More than a scientific analysis such as Aristotle got started, ontology is a way of considering the entire phenomenon of existing and being aware of existing.

For millennia a philosophy of existence-an ontology-was necessarily phenomenal. The 20th century philosopher Jean Paul Sartre wrote an epic tome named ‘Being and Nothingness’ during the Second World War that epitomizes a conscious phenomenal epistemology inclusive of ontology. Descartes’ cogito ergo sum-I think therefore I am- is simultaneously an ontological and epistemological phenomenality.

In ancient Sumer atop the Ziggurats there were great dressed up dolls portraying Babylonian gods (ref. Rosenberg’s Abraham-The First Biography) that were moved around by a priesthood for the benefit of the masses below who could look up and observe a great play explaining the mechanics of ontology. That mechanics differed from that of ontological phenomenalism. A mechanics for being is today named physics rather than philosophy. Cosmology around the time of Sartre’s composition of ‘Being and Nothingness’ was moving towards its modern phase though not quite there yet. From Lemaitre’s interpretation of Einstein’s General theory of Relativity the concept of the Big Bang or inflation of a Universe from a singularity arose. Late in the 20th century physical cosmology surpassed ontological phenomenalism as the fundamental theory of being.

Not that Sartre’s subjectivist approach to ontology is wrong, it is simply limited to a place within cosmological ontology. People and science regard the mind and its place in nature as fitting within a steady state field (not one like Fred Hoyle’s) wherein exists everything in the Universe. That field is often thought to be the Higgs field named for Peter Higgs-a field that provides every particle-wave with mass. Where the perturbations flowing through the field arose from to start with is challenging to say. The field itself is, I think, though to be expansionist itself from a singularity. With all the great physical theory based on and often confirmed by observation a phenomenalist epistemology is severely challenged to get attention. Some physicists believe philosophy and ontology hasn’t kept up with cosmology and science. Of course some neurologists and psychiatrist also believe their study of the brain and human behavior have transcended a phenomenal epistemology like that of Sartre. Reductionism explaining away the holistic experience of mind and being within a Universal Higgs field.

For some time in history spanning a few thousand years theological approaches to ontology were preeminent over physical and cosmological approaches. With evolution theory and later Big Bang cosmology and even later the Hubble Space telescope and microwave telescopes able to observe the pattern of the background radiation of the Universe left over from the era less than 400,000 years after the Big bang when the Universe cooled down enough to let electrons escape, there were two great theories that seem to oppose, at least initially, theological paradigms about the Universe. So at the end of the 20th century theology and ontology were to some prima facie obsolete. While work had gone into science, less so did modernization after reflection arise in theology and philosophical ontology based on phenomenal approaches.

Obviously some ontologies like that of Bishop Berkeley’s Ideaism were not able to be refuted technically. Berkeley’s arguments remained valid as did Sartre’s even as reductionists challenged each part simply because of the recursive nature of arguments and responses. In fact entire scientific cosmologies arose that took up a phenomenal approach to mechanics with the innovation of cosmological holography theory and higher dimensional spaces.

The Bible book of Genesis itself may be taken in more than one way and is amenable to modern interpretations permissive of relativistic time paradigms even as theologians may interpret God’s omnipotent and omniscient potential as encompassing a level 4 Multiverse (re: M. Tegmark) wherein everything is actually static and pre-existing while human minds journey through and infinite number of them branching and switching to different Universes with each individual new thought though unaware. Assumptions about the Bible and the nature of God tend to restrict the possible ways of interpreting the book of Genesis though theologians readily stipulate the absolute, omnipotent power of God. Jesus Christ’s reference to God having many mansions could refer as well to an infinite Multiverse as well as apartments or buildings in one metaphysical realm.

As philosophy and science were apparently briefly surpassed by modern scientific cosmology in the field of ontology at least, remarkably within a generation science itself provided the tools to renormalize each as fields of study consistent with the Bible and or ontological phenomenalism (with all due respect to Edmund Husserl though I am not above referring preponderantly to his works such as ‘Logical Investigations’).

Hillary’s Take of Millions of Americans- ‘Trailer Trash’

Hillary Clinton apparently shares her husband Bill’s elitist contempt for millions of Americans as ‘trailer trash’. She named half of Donald Trump’s supporters ‘deplorables’. Hillary Clinton is the Democrat Party face of the one-party global imperial-oligarch-corporatist system. The Bushes, Ryans, Romneys and McCains being the other side.

It is not a coincidence that billionaire Mark Cuban has made such hateful remarks about Donald trump as a supporter of Hillary. The billionaires know who butters their Wall Street bread, and it isn’t billionaire Donald Trump.

Trump is the American placeholder trying to keep the people from reduction to a status as politically impotent bugs scurrying about under the rock of globalism. Clinton calls Trumps supporters racists, homophobes and sexists yet she is the candidate that relies on just those points for her own support. The Clinton Democrat party deregulated Wall Street enabling the concentration of wealth and 2008 financial collapse. The Democrat Party and her corporatist internet supporters repress or censor free speech indirectly taking down websites where dissent to the creeping tide of corporatism might be effectively opposed. The Democrat party today is a tool for promotion of globalism and eventually, oligarchy.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/09/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-basket-of-deplorables/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republicans-jump-on-clintons-deplorables-remark/2016/09/10/91a3c148-775c-11e6-8149-b8d05321db62_story.html

Hillary Clinton does not want to talk about economic classes in the U.S.A. and ways to directly benefit the poor and middle class. Instead she relies on diving economic classes into racial groups, sexes and perversion preferences in order to polarize and neutralize internal support for nationalism and positive economics.

Hillary Clinton does not understand the Trump’s primary support is from people seeking economic progress for all Americans rather than globalists and oligarchs. It is her constituency treated as dumb jackasses fed a diet of polemical manure that she has the most contempt for, treating them as intellectually brain dead.

Issues With Another Alaska Pipeline

I wasn’t going to write on Governor Walker’s plan to build a gas pipeline at at all believing that Alaska’s followers of oil and gas simply aren’t going to change until a desert reaches from the Cascades to Chicago and north to Alberta. I too feel the governor is wrong with the pipeline error-and I too have written in the past for a state gas pipeline.

http://www.adn.com/alaska-news/2016/07/01/walker-administration-continues-brawl-with-oil-producers-for-gas-marketing-details/

One exception though. China is the world’s biggest CO2 polluter manufacturing products for export. It burns a huge amount of coal that might be replaced with Alaskan natural gas. I haven’t relocated the article-it was surprising to me.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/MethaneMatters/

https://cleantechnica.com/2016/08/27/us-eia-natural-gas-co2-emissions-surpassing-coal-emissions/

I read an article somewhere recently about Exxon and/or BP stating they were don’t want to develop North Slope gas because it would make a substantive increase in the world’s greenhouse gassing footprint. If a pipeline were profitable at any rate they would probably build one except for the methane by-product.
https://www.kcet.org/redefine/climate-change-is-really-dangerous-here-are-6-environmental-issues-that-are-even-worse

Evidently Trump Was Against Iraq War

The Clinton forces are claiming that Trump lied about his opposition to the Iraq war. As recently as August 11 of 2016 other Clinton forces sought to prove that Trump was against the Iraq war before  Barrack Obama took office.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-wanted-same-strategy-that-made-obama-founder-of-isis/article/2599153?custom_click=rss

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-tries-prove-iraq-war-opposition-227905

Evidently Trump was for and against the war according to the pro-Clinton media; a bittersweet policy.


A fact check page shows that Trump was preponderantly against the war.


http://www.factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/

Smallots and the Clinton Imperial Foundation

Queen Hillary‘s Dialectical Evolution 

When I wrote much of this post July 12, 2013 the nation didn’t yet have 19.5 trillion dollars of public debt as at present in 2016. Smallotry from Clinton-Obama Sunnicrats reduced the significance of debt and Wahabist madrassa proliferation to the public as they built up Sunni interests across the Middle East and Europe following the Hitler-Ottoman Empire path- even today in Syria. Clinton like Napoleon hates a Russian leader while in pursuit of duplicitous concentration of gross wealth and power for planetary oligarchs and likely her own level one imperial dynasty through The Clinton Foundation.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke stimulated the market announcing he would continue buying 85 billion dollars of Treasury bonds monthly the market rose to an all-time high. Distributing wealth to the rich and corrupt circles that brought America the 2008 financial meltdown and excessive regulation is the unconventional wisdom for the day.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_easing

Pumping imaginary cash into the economy buying mortgage backed securities (maybe better named dubious securities) with the inflation rate about 1% and letting too big to be accountable bankers have lots of no-interest cash to buy up everyone’s distressed or foreclosed home is a policy one might expect would create some sort of anomalous bubble never before seen in our times. Chairman Bernanke said the unemployment situation is actually worse than the 7.6% national average indicates. The obvious to select elite economists is that reinforcing the rich is clearly the best way to bring about full employment, good wages and jobs for all workers, a recovering ecosphere and reduction of public debt.

Queen Hillary the first is looming in 2016. If the Obama administration plan to reduce the U.S. public debt and budget deficit running the total up to 21 trillion dollars with perennial deficits can’t fix the economic doldrum the winner of the Clinton vs. Bush title bout-one the public has long clamored for, its like an Ali vs. Marciano fight after all will get a shot. Cynics might prefer a womano y womano Bruser Hillary vs. Condi Rice title fight yet like the Hearns -. Leonard fight it’s difficult to get a brilliant yet out of play contender to step into the ring (although Leonard evolved to that and did win).

Dialectical political evolution is experiencing a comeback after the 1989 slump when the Reagan vs. Gorbachev dialectical led to total ideological collapse of communism and even dialectics. The two-party U.S. political dialectical evolution of political economy has demonstrated that dialectical evolution is itself still a valid theory.

Like the two sides of a stationary rotating auger pushing throw sludge or waste or other products the Republican and Democrat parties are partisan dialectical opposites evolving the economy in a particular way processing input through to output debt, unemployment and a deteriorating national environment (ecosphere section). Without giving quantitative easing relief to philosophers outside of academic not enough theoretical development of post-cold war dialectical evolution has been funded by government extremists content with the other corporate-government dialectical kickback evolution.

Dialectical political evolution is simply a stage in the reduction of economic pluralism to monism. From a pluralistic economic environment with a myriad of competitors an economy through networking and inter-corporate board sharing and insider trading is reduced to a few corporations with limited competition. It may evolve downward in number until a two-stage dialectic evolves; yet like the tripartite foundation of the U.S. Government before corporatism an economy works better with three rivals in a trialectic evolution. More than that requires more than simple math to calculate and is often avoided by politicians and economists.

A dialectical evolution of D.N.A. is the basis of a human genome. A trialectical basis for the genome with an extra strand of P.N.A. instead of D.N.A. would allow political dynasties to evolve within the two party structure by surpassing the political mortality of term limits. Human genes implicit let genetic chaos and mortality develop because of inherent failure to recalibrate and return to original condition genetic stability. An emergent lifetime of Clinton or Bush Presidencies could be negated by selection or merger to a champion King or Queen Bush or Clinton with the evolved dialectical kickback line of Presidential families racing to the top perfected instate-of-the-art political laboratories in Boston.

For the time being the trialectical third helix of political immortality is simple a shadow government ghost selecting the winners and losers in American economic free enterprise. There may be an infinite number of dialectical and trialectical systems in existence simultaneously if they are not powerful enough to dominate or totalize national or global economics.

A trialectical processes of reinventing the U.S. economic system to expand beyond the rather myopic dialectical evolution toward political pluralism and the goals of full employment, good wages for all, decreasing concentration of wealth and increasing ecospheric health and biological diversity isn’t likely to occur without something of genius in U.S. political leadership. That hope ended in the first Clinton administration’s echoed in the Hollywood zeitgeist Dumb and Dumber.

A Book on Obamanomics

Richard J. Carroll published a book on President Obama’s economic record compared to the other 11 post-World War II Presidents and found he finished in 8th place. Mr. Carroll may not have included the decade-long expansion of money supply 400% during his administration  that started two years before his first term. That practice provided so much free money and opportunity to mint e-dollars via zero-interest Fed Reserve loans to rich banks and may be regarded as the reason the Obama-Clinton years didn’t finish in last place.

Mr. Carroll published an article on his book at:

 https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-09-06/how-obama-s-economic-record-stacks-up

Sustainable U.S. National

Sustainable U.S. nationalism is a prerequisite for creating an ecologically sustainable economy. An ecologically sustainable economy with liberty and economic justice for all citizens requires much intelligence, determination and will to evolve into being. The global economic system would not support many if any necessary reforms and worse-owns the broadcast media acting to defeat U.S. nationalism.

Strong U.S. nationalism is requisite for democratic control rather than gradual subduction under planetary plutonomy. Large nations such as the U.S.A., Russia, China, Australia etc require strong nationalism with a trade differential able to effectively engage with other nations yet retain the power of self-determination. Solely with national political self-determination might democracy elect a new or reformed economic system that reverses the present global economic system methodically destroying the ecosystem of the planet so far as human life goes.

Small nations-the runts, are better off in de facto trade unions preponderantly. Their political self-determination may be overwhelmed by a single global corporation. In banding together carefully they may be able to defend their trade interests better to a limited extent.

The present global economic system is preponderantly above the laws of national democracies and lead rather than follow the law. Recent U.S. Presidents have served as butlers to global corporate interests deregulating where possible ans expediting planetary free trade agreements to allow global economic corporatism the freedom to exploit world resources including people as they deem; even fluidly relocating profit beyond tax accountability. It is a system draining the environment, expanding the human and corporate footprint until no wild spaces remain for wild life on Earth, heating the atmosphere with business and technology gases, concentrating wealth, engendering an aloof elitism and corrupting free enterprise for ordinary people except as it is co-opted to serve the plutonomized-oligharchic global economic structure.

Strong U.S. nationalism is required as the basic entry point for an enlightened democracy with a stable population to elect economic change and regulate it in order to conform to environmental economic criteria for continuing life and economic efficiency.

U.S. voters should vote for objective economic class interests rather than follow bait of race,perversion or gender enhancement. When all Americans have economic justice the former fade away. Full employment within a sustainable eco-economic system developed nationally can serve as a role model for the world to follow. That will never develop within an increasingly globalist environment where democratic changes to the present economic system are impossible. I have elsewhere described that system to a limited extent. It is not socialist. Instead it is a directed economic evolution with business at a certain scale required to conform to ecological criteria. Capital is also progressively taxed with the most rich being no more than 500x wealthier than the most impoverished. Excess tax inflow is invested by the government in environmental restoration, education and space exploration.

The patent system would be reformed and expedited with a public co-op created where inventors could safely market their works to producers.

Corporations would be limited to 5000 employees maximum. Natural selection of good ideas would allow social selection of business models to reinforce. All citizens would have a guaranteed minimum income for several good purposes including letting middle class young people afford an free, self-directed intellectual career without wasting time in menial labor or economic careerism for rent paying. Presently the black culture has yet to evolve a substantial intellectual cultural tradition because of the time required for evolution culturally away from origin in a slave market. As it is inheritance is the best available way for bright young blacks to afford an intellectual liberty without strings or quality reduction and that is usually too late in life and/or rare since fewer pass on significant savings to the next generation in the present globalist economy.

True free intellectuals require financial support. Before electrification priests were often intellectuals drawing from community church financial support. Copernicus (Kopernik) and Gregory Mandel for instance, where Catholic scientists.

There are several varieties of contemporary intellectuals, yet just those with independent if limited financial means are actually free from social structural conformal logic. Intellectuals practicing law or in the film industry have limited degrees of freedom; occupational and professional structures require conformity as needed. A few are fortunate enough to earn enough with little time opportunity-cost to devote themselves to thought and research unobligated.

Free intellectuals with lots of time to research and think are actually very productive- not all become Marxist revolutionaries, join ISIS or follow Hillary Clinton on Twitter. Actually the number of those probably are few.

With a strong U.S. nationalism and secure borders it is theoretically possible that an enlightens populace will vote to office leaders in national ecological economics and full employment with a goal of continuing technological and quality of life progress for all citizens within a recovering environment. Nations, like homeowners that want to turn off lights to save electricity or turn them on for light in the darkness need to flip the switches one at a time rather than everywhere in the home at once. Without strong nationalism where good ecological economic policy and economic justice affording a high quality of life and free enterprise opportunities for all citizens exist developing in one real nation, then another, it is unlikely to develop anywhere-the present global economic unaccountability of the trans-national business environment is far too strong and socially unwilling to relinquish power and turn to better policies on its own that would contradict its own Wall Street logic and investor methods.

Race Over Nation for Kaepernick

San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick has joined what President Obama call’s a long line of (negro) athletes that have pissed on the U.S. national anthem to protest racial inequality or lack of racial supremacy etc. president Obama supports that as may Hillary Clinton. President Obama early in his first term would not have been caught dead wearing an American flag lapel pin.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2016/09/05/obama-defends-kaepernicks-national-anthem-protest/89879478/

SOmething like 1.1 million Americans have died in wars including the U.S. civil war. The vast majority of the casualties were white men. However the oldest living U.S. veteran is a black man. There are obviously black veterans that respect the constitution over race and nation over globalism, Mecca and race yet they are a small percent of black Americans.

The late Muhammad ALi refused to serve his nation in time of war. Like Jane Fonda he was a pacifist with minor imperfections of a thirst for violence. He viewed the U.S.A. as a racist nation as do many eccentric black Americans, though he was too large to be a real V.C. warrior. Joe Frazier might have been a tunnel rat hunting V.C. if called to her-we was not.

With the vast public debt President Obama has built up, and with such substantial Anti-Americanism from black celebrities and the Democrat Party left some will consider refusing the pledge and the national anthem in protest of homosexuall marriager-an abomination-and of globalism and godless atheism. Maybe they and Colin Kaepernick will solve all those problems by getting the U.S.A. to break up into smaller states leaving the public debt with the last entity calling itself ‘U.S.A.’

 

In this age where creeping globalism is fundamentally subverting the American democracy and where the Democrat Party is duping its followers to allow the concentration of wealth public figures ought to disambiguate themselves from the appearance of supporting race over national interest. The U.S.A. has a history of progressive equalization of human rights. Other nations have preponderantly experienced various forms of social stratification legally in that same time period. Ignorant leaders with racial agendas shouldn’t overlook reality and ought to support and defend the United States rather than its assailants.

Raising the Hoop

Because the game was intended for people like short Canadians (boys) tossing peaches or larger spheres into a basket fixed at some height (e.g. 10′) above the ground while players grew and became adult specialists the game changed to something requiring upgrades. With the profusion of technology the N.B.A. could afford a movable hoop and backboard that rises to 12 feet during a game with mobility from the first quarter at a regular incline. Maybe the backboard should change its slant and even the hoop rotate clockwise in a full circle during the game.

N.F.L. goalposts could start wide as at present then reduce their width each quarter until in the 4th the gap is just 6 feet. Tactics would change considerably in each sport.

Washington’s Future in Beijing-Go East Young Transexual

The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a logical continuation of President Bill Clinton’s start in NAFTA and subsequent trade agreements to surrender sovereignty and democracy in the United States to global oligarchy. President Obama’s early childhood upbringing in the nation of Indonesia presents a U.S. leader with a too natural eastern center point of view on trade policy. With the Clinton-Obama-Bush trade mosaic giving up a focus on U.S. development and prosperity for that of Wall Street, recrudescent British Imperialists through business and finance the future of the United States and even the world economically and politically speaking continues to decline.

 

A United States flood by illegal aliens and Asians with industrial production shifted offshore leaves the United States poorer even while the world ecosystem is in decline. A plutocratic global concentration of wealth and power driving American interests down in favor of a Beijing central partnership with Harvard and global financial elites does well to destroy the former social fabric of the United States and remake it into a nation of corporate lackeys with corporatism uniting leadership with the CHinese Communist Party.

 

Marxism and atheism under the dialectical infrastructure of evolution is not a necessary political, theological or philosophical ontology so much as it is a simple, popular way to drive the masses into servitude lowering their expectations and ability to accomplish free enterprise, democratic reform and self-determination. It is a wonder that not so many find it funny that the rope capitalists sell to communists to hang free enterprise and democracy with is actually produced in China too.
The world does face grave financial and ecological challenges that can be successfully addressed best with ecological economics within a democratic environment with new value theory. The Democrat Party of the U.S.A. hasn’t an interest in that direction at all. It is a partner of those Republicans such as Bushes, Ryans, Romneys and McCains interested more in concentrating wealth than in preserving and defending the freedom, free enterprise, advancing all citizens to prosperity and environmental recovery.

Side Effects of Hillary’s Rat Poison Dosage

Hillary Clintion may have some sort of disease besides bad ethics shared with her husband. She reportedly is using the drug coumadin. That is intended to prevent heart attacks, blood clots and strokes although it can have deleterious side effects such as dizziness and bleeding in the skull housing unit.

I can answer the question that the use of a drug intitially made as rat poison by the Presidential candidate along with her weakness, dizziness etc. is not too much of a problem that the candidate ought to step down or lay down fropm the rigors of a tough job.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/doctor-hillary-taking-rat-poison-for-blood-clots/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O3QO-Bssv4

President Barrack Obama has played golf hundreds of times in his seven years and Hillary can use such ample leisure for naps. She will have expert medical workers constantly surrounding her in case she has more attacks. The job of the President is fundamentally to be a front person for globalists and to hold parties and receive contributions near and far. The voter’s job is just to approve the right globalist put forward by  Harvard electors. Hillary just needs to cross the finish line in first and then she can resume the same sort of life she would if not President except with a lot of power to delegate.

It’s another not-to-worry issue for Democrats obviously. The late Sen. Ted Kennedy had brain cancer for years and performed his usual wacky job even helping get Barrack Obama elected. That’s not so bad perhaps since Sen. Ted Cruz and Speaker of the House Ryan have helped get Hillary elected by not supporting the Republican candidate.

https://www.drugs.com/coumadin.html

People expect Hillary to be unfit for office yet acceptable even so because she is Hillary. If Hillary were stuffed and wheeled in by secret service taxidermy specialist she would still be o.k. so long as Bill was around as a ventriloquist to channel her ideas.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/shocking-news-released-about-hillary-rodham-clintons-health-bombshell/

In other Hill news the F.B.I. found 14,000 more state department emails Hillary didn’t turn over .

http://daily1.ddns.net/news/fbi-found-14000-new-hillary-clinton-emails

Days of Creation With Multiverse

I was having some trouble getting a video to process on a netbook, so I completed half of it and will post the complete version later. A multiverse seems consistent with God’s omnipotent and omnipotent character as do many other aspects of a structure where spirit branches through an infinite structure that is a Multiverse. None of that is in this video. I should write more about that later.

Four Hundred % Rise in U.S. Money Supply in 10 Years?

There is a book by Porter Stansberry going over the impending financial crisis in the U.S.A. that  if accurate twood be challenging for most.

https://orders.cloudsna.com/chain?cid=MKT232586&eid=MKT243492&utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=referral&step=start&hpmv=2&mp_distinct_id=156a8ffe3b10-0d6c4ce848fc6f-3f73035d-96000-156a8ffe3b81b##AST44484

I can’t say how accurate it is yet it has many interesting points, and is of course an ad to buy a book with more information. That’s allright though.

Obama Admin Admits The $400 Million to Iran Required Hostage Release

President Obama said it was illogical to call 400 million dollars exchanged for hostages ‘ransom’. Today however the state department admitted it demanded the release of the hostages in order for Iran to get the cash in several currencies. That is an example of the Harvard elite attitude  of whatever we say is right, what you say wrong, we don’t make mistakes etc. for which Hillary C is famous. She is a lawyer that has accomplished the reversal of the ethics for attorneys that even the appearance of conflicts of interest and lying should be avoided. With Hill and Bill we assume they are lying.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/iran-payment-hostage-release-227170

The Clinton Foundation announced it will cease receiving corporate and foreign donations if elected.  They may believe a Clinton White House would be the time to kickback favors to large donors rather than receive pay offs because a Democrat voter might think something’s wrong with it-or even two.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/08/18/clinton-foundation-end-foreign-donations-if-hillary-elected/88969534/

Hillary and Cold War Splendor

In the era of global warming it is challenging to have a cold war. The continuing existence of the Warsaw pact’s peer military organization after the end of the Cold War may have been the groundwork for recreating a cold war at least in part so N.A.T.O. would continue to have something to exist for.

It would have been far cheaper to let N.A.T.O. remain what it was in reduced scale than to find new post-cold war roles for it in tasks it was unsuited and unplanned for such as counter-terrorism and conflicts in non-invasive Muslim nations.

The United States needed no help in Iraq or Afghanistan with goof intel (as unlikely as that was), and would have benefited from expanding global counter-terror, intelligence and special ops force instead of mal-adapting N.A.T.O.

The Clintons of course were the inventors of modern American snatch and grab post-Soviet era countries from Russia and that has led to problems. Hillary Clinton and President Bamako also choose to subvert Christian and Alawite elements ion Syria and force a Sunni axis of evil upon that nation. They have their heads so far up their stupidities they couldn’t wrap a roll of toilet paper around it to get a sight of real policy.

The Clinton-Harvard Puppetocratic Prospect

Global elites form sometimes through location, position, accumulated advantage and the inertia of power rather than some process of hypothetical merit. Harvard alumni and the government is one such organizational phenomenon. It has taken control of the Supreme Court and White House and reaches throughout the government and business.Donald Trump is not part of that and the media hate him.

The media is owned by concentrated wealth and it is globalist. Hillary Clinton says the right things to appeal to non-white males and perverts, yet what she does isn’t too hot. The elites believe a low growth economy is environmentally sound- and it might be if the economy were founded entirely on an ecological economic basis. It is not and the Democrat Party has no intention of doing so. The wealth of the 1% grows, elites have good jobs and that is enough. The masses cannot expand anymore because it’s a crowded world so they don’t need the money or traditional economic growth rates.The prospectus seems to be a global melting pot of peonization in order to hush political restiveness while in real terms downsizing everything so far as possible.

Donald Trump wants to grow the economy along traditional lines at a 5 or 6% pace I suppose.That would be good for blacks, Latinos and poor unemployed or underemployed whites that want a better than welfare sort of lifestyle. Sheriff Clarke of Milwaukee recently described the well known problems with the black community. Trump might be able to create more jobs in trades than Clinton, and more jobs mean less crime and a better lifestyle. The need to evolve to an entirely new quality sort of  economic foundation is evident with the environment being the way it is-overused and stressed. The elites aren’t getting it done and can’t because of their unwillingness to lead or sacrifice traditional economic advantage.

Instead of classical economic measurements for health and vitality of the U.S. economy the nation should find a way to determine that quality lifestyles for all are increasing. Social values should mean quality lifestyle and economic goals ought to be to create the best standard of living and the healthiest environment that humanity can. Letting the environment be an externality or practico-inert mass for consumption or use without other significance is dangerous to human health. It is important to keep full employment and social security at all ages of life rather than for a few or a small period of time.

Corporate growth and size should be limited to 3000 employees in order to prevent accumulation of wealth and power that destroys the fact of democracy. Individuals should not be permitted to earn income such that it develops extreme political power. In today’s dollar the most rich anyone should be is one billion dollars, and it should take time to collect that. Anything over ten times the average wage should be progressively taxed and the money used to fund environmental restoration and quality of life issues for the majority.

It would be a good idea for society to vet new business start ups and determine if they are ecologically efficient. Environmental efficiency creating useful products at least cost to the environment should be voted upon for approval and good ahead.Intelligent individuals with good business ideas ought to go forward, Taxation on wasteful and polluting businesses greater than on those that are not. Marriage should have tax structures that reward natural childbirth and monogamous couples that stay together and raise good kids-with progress tax incentives and rewards since it is socially beneficial.

Certainly drugs, urban crime and repeat arrests are part of a culture of dysfunction that flourishes in black communities. That makes it important to change toward new economic values and family values for that American minority group as well as others. It is necessary to measure quality growth if quantitative growth is intentionally restricted by Clinton-Harvard elites too happy to take care of their own interests as if there were a eugenics element involved. While the American political system may no longer be a real democracy it should not be a puppetocracy to pacify the masses.

Karjakin the Definite Underdog at World Chess Championship

Because it’s basically impossible for Russian challenger Sergey Karjakin to defeat Magnus Carlsen this November in the world chess championship, most hope he wins. Magnus has been an excellent champion with stellar deportment for such a young fellow-still just 25 however he is better than everyone else usually by at least 40 ratings points when his game is off. Karjakin is only rated 8th in the world about 90 point lower than Carlsen.

http://www.2700chess.com/

Former champion Vishy Anand twice played Carlsen and lost convincingly. Many regard Karjakin as not quite as good as Anand. Karjakin is not a boring player though. With some extreme luck and careful surprise planning he just might pull off the upset. No one believes that though. And that is why most hope Karjakin wins yet don’t mind when Magnus does as he will.

No one cares that Karjakin’s Ukrainian homeland was stolen from him by Bill Clinton who got an alcoholic Boris Yeltsin to relinquish it from the new Russia that was forming at the breakup of the Soviet Union. Karjakin choose to move to Moscow and be part of Russia as a young man. At age 26 Karjakin is a young guy too from the great Russian chess tradition facing a champion perhaps the equal of Bobby Fischer, Paul Morphy, Garry Kasparov, Steinitz and Lasker. Not until another four years go under the bridge will 17-year old Wei Ye of China perhaps be ready to move on to challenge Magnus Carlsen and win.

If Magnus Carlsen actually lost to Sergey Karjakin it is terrible to think about how he would tune up his game to recover the world title.