There are several views on cosmology structures, the Lamda CDM is one with GR and Spacetime and that contrasts with Newton’s idea of the void (modify that to be a void without time at all rather than ‘absolute time’ of Newton that GR shows to be incorrect. They throw out the idea of a pre-existent /eternal/timeless void with GR. A modern theory that may surpass the voodoo Lamda Cold Dark Matter CDM model is one that has space-time and all of the contingent-entangled Universe being comparable to an illusion that occurs on or from an underlying timeless realm.
https://suno.com/song/00e58a3d-32f8-47e6-83a8-bc9e1714c4b9?sh=j5dzWfbYUgjlJB7M
I asked Gemini to compare the GR Big Bang model of space-time with Newton’s void. I believe the GR model of space-time expansion occurred within the void, while math of the Lamda CDM model and GR ignore the void altogether and just consider space-time of the Universe. If the Lamda CDM model cosmology is contingent the no-space void seems like a suitable host ‘structure’ for faster-than light entanglement to pass through instantly.
Image above courtesy of Gemini
Garrison Gibson: books and blog 
One response
Kind regards. Regarding the “problem of the value of the Cosmological Constant,” and taking into account the academic recognition that Artificial Intelligence Programs are achieving in Physics and Cosmology consultations, I tell you that: 8 of these programs were consulted about “the origin of the unit of measurement of the Planck constant,” and it turns out that they all agreed in responding that “this unit of measurement has an implicit physical term in its denominator, and that when considered, it allows us to convincingly deduce that the value of the Cosmological Constant resulting from Quantum Field Theory is exaggerated and therefore the real value must correspond to the value obtained in astrophysical measurements”! If you are interested in taking a look at these results, let me know so I can send you the descriptive texts. Sincerely, José Alberto (diazreyesjosealberto62@gmail.com)
LikeLike