Seems something like Tegmark’s Level 4 Multiverse. Theologically what is real in the infinite mind of God is challenging to define in other terms reduced for human interpretation. An omnipotent, infinite spirit perhaps actualizes infinite Universes within His mind and makes them as real as he wants them to be.
https://suno.com/s/JmDVMUlI5c1LCjwi
Gemini said of modal realism; “”In essence, model realism proposes that scientific theories, when formalized, can be interpreted as descriptions of abstract structures that reflect the structure of the world.”
Here is the paradigm that set off the comment I made as a consideration one of the forms of model realism. Realism you may know, is the idea that abstract structures exist independently of human thought. It is an ancient school that perhaps began with Plato’s Republic and the realm of forms. In linguistic philosophy realism was applied to language and that question of words having meanings that are independent of their use. Saul Kripke was a neo-realist and W.V.O. Quine was more of a nominalist. He thought that words exist in lexicons use, and that some ideas last as rigid designators, yet over time the meanings change for words. Lewis applied model (as in model logic) to the idea of a Multiverse. Most philosophers apparently don’t believe the idea that because s concept can be made, it therefor must exist in the actual Universe somewhere.
https://suno.com/s/IhzZfxSQeoifQsgM
Gemini wrote more; “Here is what Gemini said about Lewis’s viewpoint; “Model realism, particularly as articulated by David Lewis, proposes that all logically possible worlds are real and exist on par with our own, while the multiverse is a broader concept suggesting the existence of multiple universes, potentially with different physical laws. While both concepts involve multiple “worlds,” their core ideas and motivations differ: model realism is a philosophical stance on possibility, whereas the multiverse is a cosmological hypothesis.
Here’s a more detailed breakdown:
Model Realism:
- Core Idea:
All logically possible worlds, or at least those consistent with the laws of logic, exist as concrete realities alongside our own.
- Motivation:
Philosophers like David Lewis proposed modal realism to explain how we talk about possibility and necessity. If something is possible, it means there’s a world where it’s true, and if that world is real, it supports our modal claims.
- Key Feature:
Worlds are considered equally real, and the term “actual” is indexical, meaning it refers to the world the speaker inhabits according to Wikipedia.
- Example:
If it’s possible for it to rain tomorrow, then according to modal realism, there’s a whole other universe where it’s raining tomorrow.
Multiverse:
- Core Idea:
The existence of multiple universes, potentially with different physical laws, constants, or even dimensions.
- Motivation:
Arises from various cosmological theories, like inflationary cosmology and the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, which suggest the possibility of other universes beyond our own.
- Key Feature:
Universes may or may not interact with each other, and their physical laws and properties can vary significantly according to Wikipedia.
- Example:
The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests that every quantum possibility branches off into a separate universe.
Relationship:
- Both involve multiple “worlds,” but the nature and implications of these worlds differ. Model realism deals with logical possibility and its philosophical implications, while the multiverse focuses on the physical possibility of other universes.
- While some multiverse theories, like the mathematical universe hypothesis, might be seen as related to modal realism, they are distinct concepts. Modal realism is a philosophical stance on the reality of possibilities, while the multiverse is a cosmological hypothesis about the existence of multiple universes.
- Modal realism – Wikipedia
Modal realism is the view propounded by the philosopher David Lewis that all possible worlds are real in the same way as is the ac…
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Many-worlds interpretation – Wikipedia
The many-worlds interpretation implies that there are many parallel, non-interacting worlds. It is one of a number of multiverse h…
Wikipedia”
Garrison Gibson: books and blog 