Authors that are oppressed by corrupt governments, corporations and laws designed to repress political incorrect speech and define it as hate speech to conform it to politically correct lexical criteria defined primarily by partisans probably don’t regard anyone besides those enacting the laws or structures of oppressive censorship as responsible- with the exception of including those that actively support it or supported the movement toward censorship. When corporations and AI word editing systems refuse to edit historical material that contains words that are on a partisan list of politically banned terms, that ongoing exclusion comprises institutionalized oppression by technocracy. Linguists have a couple of terms to broadly classify language structure; the syntagmatic and the paradigmatic axis. In my opinion AI editors like Claude should be limited to repairing the syntagmatic axis- grammar and not have a capability of censoring the paradigmatic axis (meaning) without consent of the author.; especially if they take partisan political issue with the meaning of what they edit.

Leave a comment