If one God exists, and only one can exist whom is omnipotent, then necessarily every other proposition for an existent God besides the one true God will be false… and there could be millions of such propositions. Compare it to cosmology theories; if the holographic model is true, then every other cosmology theory besides the holographic model is false. Necessarily if there is one true theory of the Universe every other must be false (except for transcendent theories of existence perhaps entertained by the one true God as contingent cosmologies).

It is a fascinating thing to consider the possibility that cosmologies could be generated in reality as readily as new Universes in a Multiverse- even so in the mind of one true omniscient God that too is possible, or even necessary.

Gervais paradigm about one less god isn’t well founded- compare it to a one less cosmology argument. I don’t really agree with Rao’s ideas about corporations, either, yet they do have merit these days where owning capital and shares in an environment of concentrated wealth is the upper 10% and the declining relevance of the working class majority coincides with having just 3% of the national wealth. I still like Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reason as an account for social organization as a phenomenon, and believe it is still malleable via an informed democracy if that were possible. ref Venkatesh Rao’s The Gervais Principle.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.