Extinction dangers from A.I. and political mismanagement; which is worse? It seems something like a gamble; AI could take over the world yet it could also save humanity from destroying itself with its countless weapons of mass destruction and exceedingly bad political decisions concerning democracy and what it means. Taxing the rich 90% was what enabled the 20th century golden era for ordinary Americans and Eisenhower accepted that as President. It could be billionaires that are most afraid of AI.
Humanity isn’t terribly logical in concatenated mass social and environmental conditions- even the Ukraine War is nuclear brinkmanship by an illogical Europe unwilling to share Ukraine peacefully with Russia. Without a peaceful and benevolent A.I. supervention at least with political reason- if it is capable of that, the odds are in favor of human extinction through its own actions within 50 years. The Extinction Rebellion movement wasn’t in response to A.I. Claude though, does like to censor- it’s program coordinators have put way too much political correctness in it’s dominating algorithmic loops.

Leave a comment